What does today's announcement of the 2016 Summer Olympics being awarded to Rio de Janeiro mean for golf's chances of inclusion in those Games? Perhaps nothing, but I have a feeling it certainly can't help.
The other three finalists, Chicago, Madrid and Tokyo, all have numerous golf courses, not to mention a long golf history and an understanding of the game among its citizens. Any sort of golf tournament in those cities was bound to produce a well-attended (by both players and fans) event at a worthy course.
There are no such assurances in Rio. In our 20-year history, we have written about golf in Brazil exactly once, which I suspect is more than any other U.S. golf publication. I know nothing about golf in Brazil, but a little search has turned up two decent sites in Rio: Gavea Golf and Country Club and Itanhanga Golf Club. The photos seem OK, but the layouts don't compare courses like Cog Hill or Kawana, which would have been great Olympic courses.
I'm not sure how it works, but Brazil's lack of a golf culture certainly has to play a part in the decision of whether golf will be included in 2016. We'll know in a week, when the IOC announces which two sports will be included from among seven candidates: golf, baseball, karate, roller sports, rugby, softball and squash.
Of course, golf is just a tiny reason for choosing an Olympics host, but you have to believe that for those with a stake in golf's inclusion in the games, Rio was last on their ballots.